leaving out info.

an article from media matters claims that the Wall Street Journal left out information when claiming that ACORN submitted false voter registrations. The article failed to leave out the fact that in 9 of the 11 states mentioned in the article, had to submit ALL forms received, even if they looked false or duplicate. So really, how can they accuse an organization without displaying all the facts. It's like they left out information in order to have an argument and an article. When in reality, the claims cannot really be made since it was a requirement to send all forms received. It just seems that a well-known, credible paper would write responsibly and tell all information, especially when citing accusations of organization like ACORN doing something bad. Shouldn't the journalists be telling all of the information? isnt that their job?